|
Just when you think you've seen every layer of the "Invisible Empire" at play, a new piece of evidence drops that perfectly illustrates the lengths to which immense wealth can go to control a narrative.
A new article from SFGate here and DailyMail here - provides a fresh, unsettling example. This recently published article, discusses a lawsuit against the exclusive Bohemian Club, where employees alleged labor law violations during their infamous Bohemian Grove event. Within this lawsuit, there's a specific, bizarre allegation: one employee claimed he was mocked for complying with a request from billionaire William Koch to hand-wash his underwear. Now, here's where it gets truly telling: William Koch's spokesperson has denied these allegations, specifically stating that William Koch was never even there at Bohemian Grove. Think about that. A legal document, a lawsuit, contains an allegation directly naming William Koch in an incident. And his response? Not a denial of the incident itself, but a denial of his presence. This is a profound red flag. It aligns perfectly with the pattern of denial and disavowal I've faced for 15 years regarding his brother Frederick's involvement in the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum heist. It echoes the "no memory whatsoever" response I received from John Olsen when I first presented evidence of Frederick's art dealings with my mother. It reinforces the image I've painted of the Koch brothers' privileged and potentially problematic behavior. But more significantly, William Koch's denial of even being present at a place where he's named in a lawsuit perfectly fits the "Invisible Empire" playbook. This lawsuit, now confidentially settled, highlights how wealth and influence can make uncomfortable truths disappear quietly, away from public scrutiny, even to the point of denying one's very presence. This isn't just a bizarre anecdote. It's a fresh, undeniable example of the very behavior I’m fighting against: the use of power and wealth to control narratives, to deny inconvenient truths, and to escape accountability. It tells me that the fight to expose the Gardner Heist is fundamentally a fight against this kind of systemic denial.
Just like the "Heywood Jablomey" signature on my petition which was a crude, offensive act, designed to demean and push me away. This wasn't random.
It was a direct response to my demand for transparency on the Koch family's donations to the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum.
This act of aggression is, in my view, a clear indicator that it is highly likely they have received a donation, and this was their panicked reaction to my call for accountability on that specific financial tie.
While anonymous donations are typically accepted, their ethical and legal standing fundamentally shifts when a major crime is involved. If an institution unknowingly accepted a donation from a perpetrator, or from a family connected to a crime, that anonymity should only be valid until the crime is discovered. The moment such a connection is brought to light, the institution's obligation to transparency and justice should supersede any prior promise of anonymity.
This raises critical questions: Was the donation made with an explicit, unspoken promise to protect the donor's identity, even if a crime were later revealed? Or does the institution's silence now, knowing a crime is alleged, imply a willingness to prioritize a past financial gift over the pursuit of truth and accountability? No one expects these institutions to return a donation if it was accepted without prior knowledge.
However, the moment they were made aware of my evidence, the moment they chose not to participate in doing the right thing, they became complicit with the criminal. Their silence, their inaction, is an active choice to protect, and that makes them part of the problem.
I believe Cambridge University is similarly hiding behind a donation. This pattern reveals a chilling truth: for these institutions, the financial influence of a donation tragically trumps truth, fairness, and any respect for the mental health of the person standing up for that truth.
Subscribe now: Crime and Canvas Podcast
See all documented evidence and updates: Evidence
|
