|
If Anthony Amore is allowed to speak at the following events, the "System" is no longer just ignoring the truth—it is actively platforming a breach of trust. As the new year begins, the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum (ISGM) and its partners are launching a high-profile "PR Blitz." They are putting Anthony Amore on global and local stages to retell the "The False Official Story." But while he speaks, the Harvard Office of General Counsel (OGC) and the Massachusetts Attorney General are now on notice of a different story: the forensic truth. The "Victory Lap" ScheduleThursday, Jan 8 (2:00 PM – 3:00 PM): "Stealing Rembrandts" Exclusive Webinar (via Rocky Ruggiero). A global digital platform to cement the narrative. Thursday, Jan 22 (12:15 PM – 1:15 PM): Art Crimes: A Talk with Anthony Amore at Boston College. Educating the next generation of legal minds using a timeline that ignores the 13-day Bourlet fire signature. Thursday, Jan 22 (7:00 PM – 8:30 PM): What Rembrandt Saw: The History of Stealing... at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. A homecoming talk at the scene of the crime, held under the authority of a Board currently facing a formal legal inquiry.
The Problem: A Breach of Fiduciary DutyHow can the Director of Security speak as an authority when he has been served with evidence that connects the 1990 heist to the 1991 Bourlet Warehouse fire (a fire that occurred exactly 13 days after the murder of suspect Bobby Donati)? The "Heywood Jablomey" Signature: I reported a senior official for using a crude, mocking alias to sign my Change.org petition—a direct harassment of a whistleblower. There were no consequences. If an institution allows its "Chief Investigator" to mock the evidence rather than investigate it, the Fiduciary Duty of the Board is forfeited.
Harvard Attorneys & AG of Massachusetts received the information below on 12/1/25URGENT LEGAL INQUIRY: Breach of Fiduciary Duty - Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Trust ForfeitureI am writing to you directly because I possess evidence indicating a severe breach of fiduciary duty and potential criminal conspiracy by the Board of Trustees of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. These actions, which relate to the 1990 Museum Art Heist, may trigger the immediate transfer of the Museum’s assets and endowment to Harvard University under the irrevocable terms of Isabella Stewart Gardner’s will. My investigation stems from my mother’s first-hand art encounters in 1992 and my evidence points to a coordinated plan to violate the Trust’s terms by orchestrating a clandestine sale (a “commissioned heist”) and subsequent cover-up secured through financial manipulation. Key Evidence of Breach and Complicity: The Orchestrator: The alleged mastermind is identified as Frederick R. Koch (deceased, Harvard/Yale alumnus), a billionaire collector whose motive was acquisition, driven by the legal impossibility of buying the art due to the Trust’s strict anti-sale stipulations. The Cover-Up and Payoff: The Museum Board is allegedly complicit in concealing this crime to protect the institution’s current governance and assets. Proof of Complicity (Retaliation): I have documented evidence of highly unprofessional and retaliatory harassment (“Heywood Jablomey in Mattapoisett, MA,” a vile signature from the museum’s locality) directed at me immediately after I publicly demanded transparency from the Museum regarding any Koch family donations via a public Change.org petition. This direct, hostile response strongly suggests a secret financial arrangement is being protected, proving the Board’s actions violate the Trust’s core stipulations. The Fiduciary Risk: The Board’s alleged complicity in perpetuating this lie represents a severe failure of its fiduciary duty—specifically, the duty to act in the Museum’s best interest, which includes acting to recover stolen assets and upholding the integrity of the Trust. This failure should, by the terms of the will, result in the forfeiture of the entire Trust and its assets to Harvard University.
I request immediate contact with the appropriate legal counsel at the Office of the General Counsel to present this evidence for evaluation. I have meticulously documented the full narrative, including physical evidence, digital logs, and correspondence with relevant authorities. Boston’s “Sherlock Holmes” and the Haystack of LiesFor thirty-five years, the world has been captivated by the mystery of the 1990 Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum heist. We have been sold a story of "policemen" and "mobsters"—a narrative carefully managed by those entrusted with the museum's security. Chief among them is Anthony Amore, often hailed as "Boston's Sherlock Holmes" for his two-decade-long "investigation." However, my investigation reveals a different story—one not found in the pages of Mr. Amore's book, The Art of the Con. The Staggering Cost of SilenceWhile the art remains missing, the financial records are crystal clear. As the Director of Security, Anthony Amore receives an annual compensation of approximately $154,317. Over his 20-year tenure, the ISGM "charity" has paid him more than $3 million to maintain a narrative that ignores the documented truth. The Question of Misappropriation:
I contend that paying such a significant salary to maintain a "fake" investigation—one that ignores credible evidence—is a clear misappropriation of funds. The Board of Trustees, by authorizing these payments while being aware of the truth, is complicit in this breach of fiduciary duty. The Whistleblower’s Burden:
For fifteen years, I have been met with derision for coming forward. But instead of directing anger toward the messenger, look at those who have profited from the silence and created this mess. Investigation: Reducing the Haystack
Anthony Amore likes to describe his work as "making the haystack smaller." But for twenty years, his "investigation" has done the opposite, burying the truth under mountains of false leads and mob-focused theories. My mother Mary’s remarkably true story about the stranger at the Florida flea market wasn't just another piece of hay. By identifying that man as Frederick R. Koch, I began the painstaking process of actually reducing the haystack. While the "experts" add more hay to protect their $1 billion narrative, I have been removing it. By analyzing the specific paintings Koch selected to sell to my mother, I reduced the infinite possibilities of a "random" theft down to a singular, commissioned truth.
I didn't create this mess; I simply found the needle they've been paid to hide. The real "art of the con" isn't just about the forgeries Amore writes about; it’s about the con being played on the city of Boston and the global art community. It is time to stop blaming the whistleblower and start holding the board and its "investigators" accountable. The Evidence StackFinancial Accountability: Public 990 forms confirm Anthony Amore's salary at $154,317, with total career earnings from the museum exceeding $3 million. Board Responsibility: Massachusetts law requires nonprofit boards to ensure funds are used for their stated charitable purpose. If a board pays for a "fake" job to suppress evidence, they may be liable for misappropriation of assets. The Methodology: While Amore uses the phrase "reducing the haystack" to justify a lack of progress, my investigation uses it to describe the elimination of false leads by focusing on the Koch-Mary Florida connection.
For years, I have stood up for this story. I wasn't afraid. I didn't have any reason to be afraid. I also don't spend much time reading about the heist and all the theories. I didn't solve this heist because I was looking to solve the heist. I honestly wish I had never stumbled upon the discovery. BUT the fact is I did. The checklist! - which is also cut canvases for cut canvases... It was a journey of finding who the "Koch" man was, with a twin brother he couldn't stand. Frederick R. Koch-CHECK Then it was trying to find the Koch-related fire at an art storage warehouse. James Bourlet & Sons fire in London-CHECK Now I know I have the man I am looking for. Now, why are they denying these transactions? Why is no one helping? There is something I am missing...
Once I discovered who the man that visited with my mother was. Then I found the fire. That explained most of what my mother shared. Now, to find out why they are denying these transactions.
The day I found the heist. I was upset that the FBI wasn't following up on my mother's strange art story - saying it is too old for them to worry about. But there in the news one day is the heist that is a year older than my mother's art story. They are looking into that! So I went and read the list of stolen artwork, and by the time I was done reading just that list, I had solved the "why" the man sold each piece to my mother. The Checklist.
It didn't matter to me what any news report stated; nothing was going to change the fact that I had solved The Checklist of the artwork sold to my mother. NOTHING!
This discovery led me to find the murder Bobby Donati and the date of his murder and the date of the fire (that belonged to our Mr. Koch), was the final nail that tied him to the heist. The art heist - all her notes, her stories, everything made sense. What conclusion would you come to?
I am not an online sleuth trying to solve some heist. I am a daughter, trying to solve and tell my mother's amazing story. That unfortunately, exposed a world of corruption so huge, according to AI, it ranks up with Watergate.
FINAL NOTICE: THE NEXT STEP "Let this be clear: If Anthony Amore proceeds to use the platforms of Rocky Ruggiero (Jan 8), Boston College (Jan 22), and the ISGM (Jan 22) to present a narrative that I have forensically proven to be a misrepresentation, I will proceed to the next step. Freedom of speech is not a license to commit professional malpractice or to facilitate a cover-up. When a Chief Investigator mocks a whistleblower with crude aliases while suppressing a billion-dollar truth, the Board has failed. If the Board will not stop him, I will ask a court of law to do so through Injunctive Relief and a Formal Claim for Breach of Fiduciary Duty. The 'Victory Lap' ends where the Truth begins."
The truth is still the truth, even if no one believes it. #NEVERGIVEUP Thank you,
Suzanne Kenney
Web Developer (Websites by Suzanne), Creator (Suzanne's eBoutique), Book Author (Crime & Canvas), Podcaster (Crime & Canvas Podcast), Investigative Reporter (UHV.news), Blogger, TheArtworkStory.com
|
