The $10 Million Exclusive: An Offer to the PressI Don’t Want the Money. I Want the Truth.To the investigative journalists, the legal analysts, and the "Gatekeepers" of Boston: For twenty years, the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum investigation has been dominated by a single narrative: The "Sherlock of Boston" hunting for a needle in a haystack. We have watched careers built, books sold, and salaries paid—all fueled by the mystery of the empty frames. The "Gatekeepers" have monetized the search. I am interested in the recovery and the truth. For fifteen years, I have possessed the "needle"—the specific, actionable intelligence regarding the location and trajectory of the stolen art, tracing back to my mother’s encounter in a Florida flea market. For fifteen years, the Museum and the FBI have met this information with silence, deflection, or gaslighting. I can assure you I am not motivated by the reward money. Today, I am changing the game.
The $10 Million Bounty: An Assignment of RightsI am formally offering to assign 100% of my legal claim to the $10,000,000 ISGM reward to the first accredited news organization that breaks this story and investigates the evidence I have compiled. How it Works: If my information leads to the recovery of the art, I will sign a legal waiver assigning the $10 million ISGM reward rights directly to your publication or network. The Carve-Out: This offer applies strictly to the $10 million ISGM reward. I am a whistleblower entitled to legal protections and any separate funds resulting from the reporting of institutional misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty, or sexual harassment, etc. Those funds—dedicated to the whistleblower's protection—remain with me.
The "Discovery Trap": Why they haven't suedIf my connections to the Koch estate and the 1991/92 Florida corridor were false, I would have received a Cease and Desist a decade ago. The silence is the evidence. A lawsuit triggers Legal Discovery, granting the press and the public access to server logs, internal emails, and 1980s Miami records that these institutions are terrified to release. The "Heywood Jablowmey" BreachIn May 2025, the ISGM Director of Security used the sexually harassing alias "Heywood Jablowmey" to sign a petition regarding this investigation. This is a Breach of Fiduciary Duty and a violation of professional oversight. Why is an individual who uses his position to harass a female whistleblower allowed to speak at Boston College Law School and the ISGM tomorrow, January 22nd? I shouldn't need an attorney to be heard. The system should be doing its job. My First Amendment right to tell our story will not be silenced by institutional bullying. The Forensic Timeline: A Quick-Ref for the MediaTo the investigative desks: Before you dismiss this as "just another theory," consider the documented synchronization of these events. The "Gatekeepers" have a narrative; I have the evidence. October 7, 1991: The Bourlet Signal. Just 13 days after Robert Donati was murdered (Sept 24, 1991), a massive and "suspicious" fire gutted the James Bourlet & Sons high-security art warehouse in London. The facility held the collection of Frederick R. Koch. April 20, 1992: The Sotheby’s Anchor. My mother signed a contract with Sotheby’s for the Jane Peterson painting (later sold/offered in Sept 1992). This contract is the legal anchor proving she possessed this during the time period we claim. October 10, 2011: The Radcliffe Return. Following my submission of the Calder drawings to Julian Radcliffe (Art Loss Register) in February 2011, the artwork was physically returned to me on this date. In the high-stakes world of art recovery, authorities do not return documented forgeries or stolen contraband—they seize them. Their return is a procedural admission of a stalemate. February 10–11, 2012: The Gentile "Coincidence". On Feb 10, the FBI raided Robert Gentile’s home and "found" a mobster’s art list. On Feb 11, while that story dominated the news, I was in Palm Beach where the Koch brothers (Charles, David, and William) were physically monitoring me at an art event with Robert Wittman—where I presented my mother's list of artwork. 2018 & 2022: The Political Spikes. The "authorized" Gardner narrative consistently intensifies when the Director of Security runs for public office. March 20, 2018: My binder of evidence was delivered to major outlets on the exact day Anthony Amore announced his run for Secretary of State. March 3, 2022: Amore announced his run for State Auditor. Six days later, the Darwin Notebooks were "theatrically" returned in a pink bag. I started working on my book Crime & Canvas - February 2022.
May 28, 2025: The "Heywood" Slip. The "mask" finally slipped when the sexually harassing alias "Heywood Jablowmey" was used to sign my Change.org petition. This digital signature provides the final forensic link to the institutional bullying that has blocked the truth for decades.
The Legal Risk: Tomorrow’s Event (Jan 22)The decision by Boston College and the ISGM to proceed with these speaking engagements after being formally notified of sexual harassment allegations creates significant legal and fiduciary risks. When an organization is made aware of credible evidence of misconduct and chooses to platform that individual anyway, they move from being "unaware" to being complicit. 1. Institutional Ratification of Conduct By allowing him to speak tomorrow, BC and the ISGM are essentially "signing off" on his professional standing. This makes it vulnerable to Vicarious Liability. If the harassment continues, the institutions can be sued for negligent supervision. 2. Breach of Fiduciary Duty (The ISGM Board) The Gardner Museum operates under a restrictive Trust. If the Board is found to be suppressing evidence or protecting an official who is actively harassing a whistleblower, they are failing their Duty of Loyalty. This could legally trigger a challenge to the Trust itself, potentially moving oversight to Harvard. 3. Title IX and Professional Ethics (Boston College) For a Law School to host a talk on "Art Crime" by an individual accused of using a sexually harassing alias to silence a woman creates a reputational risk that the Dean’s office must answer to. The Human Cost: When Bullying Operates Without OversightThe recent tragic loss of an American chess grandmaster serves as a haunting reminder of what happens when harassment is allowed to fester in specialized communities. In high-stakes environments—whether it is the world of professional chess or a $500 million art heist investigation—the power dynamic is heavily weighted against the individual. Institutional Gaslighting: For 15 years, the strategy has been to outwait and silence a "nobody." The "Heywood Jablowmey" Weapon: Using a sexually harassing alias to target a female whistleblower is an attempt to degrade and dehumanize. When this is ignored by a Board of Trustees, it tells the bully that they are untouchable. Read here when I first reported this 5/29/2025.
The "theater" of tomorrow’s events at Boston College and the Gardner Museum is being performed on a stage built from this silence. The Institutional StandoffI have been publicly exposing the Museum's Security Director for weeks. Normally, an institution defends its leadership immediately. But the ISGM hasn't sent a Cease and Desist. Why? Because a Cease and Desist starts a legal fight they know they will lose. This is a strategic silence. They are waiting for the media to "pull the trigger" so Harvard can swoop in, fire the liability, and claim they saved the Trust. They are hoping to survive the transition; I am here to ensure the truth survives with it. Do you want the biggest exclusive in art crime history? If my information is wrong, you have a story about a 15-year hoax. But if my information is right—and the art is recovered—you get the $10 million reward. Thank you,
Suzanne Kenney
Web Developer (Websites by Suzanne), Creator (Suzanne's eBoutique), Book Author (Crime & Canvas), Podcaster (Crime & Canvas Podcast), Investigative Reporter (UHV.news), Blogger, TheArtworkStory.com
|
