Harvard Attorneys & AG of Massachusetts received the info below 12/1/25

I am writing to you directly because I possess evidence indicating a severe breach of fiduciary duty and potential criminal conspiracy by the Board of Trustees of the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. These actions, which relate to the 1990 Museum Art Heist, may trigger the immediate transfer of the Museum’s assets and endowment to Harvard University under the irrevocable terms of Isabella Stewart Gardner’s will.

My investigation stems from my mother’s first-hand art encounters in 1992 and my evidence points to a coordinated plan to violate the Trust’s terms by orchestrating a clandestine sale (a “commissioned heist”) and subsequent cover-up secured through financial manipulation.

Key Evidence of Breach and Complicity:

  • The Orchestrator: The alleged mastermind is identified as Frederick R. Koch (deceased, Harvard/Yale alumnus), a billionaire collector whose motive was acquisition, driven by the legal impossibility of buying the art due to the Trust’s strict anti-sale stipulations.

  • The Cover-Up and Payoff: The Museum Board is allegedly complicit in concealing this crime to protect the institution’s current governance and assets.

  • Proof of Complicity (Retaliation): I have documented evidence of highly unprofessional and retaliatory harassment (“Heywood Jablomey in Mattapoisett, MA,” a vile signature from the museum’s locality) directed at me immediately after I publicly demanded transparency from the Museum regarding any Koch family donations via a public Change.org petition. This direct, hostile response strongly suggests a secret financial arrangement is being protected, proving the Board’s actions violate the Trust’s core stipulations.

  • The Fiduciary Risk: The Board’s alleged complicity in perpetuating this lie represents a severe failure of its fiduciary duty—specifically, the duty to act in the Museum’s best interest, which includes acting to recover stolen assets and upholding the integrity of the Trust. This failure should, by the terms of the will, result in the forfeiture of the entire Trust and its assets to Harvard University.

I request immediate contact with the appropriate legal counsel at the Office of the General Counsel to present this evidence for evaluation. I have meticulously documented the full narrative, including physical evidence, digital logs, and correspondence with relevant authorities. 

Sincerely,

Suzanne Kenney

March 18, 1990 – Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Art Heist

Browse the art Mr. Koch sold to Suzanne’s mother.

Imagine researching art encounters that your mother was part of and one day you find yourself connecting to these statements…

5 Pen & Pencil Drawings

A Manet Painting

A Man in a Hat

A Bird Finial

& MORE!

March 18, 1990 - Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Art Heist
Uncover art crimes orchestrated by billionaire Frederick R. Koch, including the $1B Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum art heist.
Uncover art crimes orchestrated by billionaire Frederick R. Koch, including the $1B Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum art heist.

A complete picture is essential for a proper evaluation. To truly judge the theory I’m presenting, it’s important to have access to and consider all the information we’ve gathered.

I assert that Frederick R. Koch and John Olsen perpetrated the 1990 Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum art heist, the largest art heist in history. What’s crucial to understand is that I solved this case by deciphering the deliberate reasoning behind Frederick R. Koch’s artwork selections during his visits with my mother. His choices, I argue, were purposeful, and I have uncovered that purpose.

After years of research, putting together the information/facts from my mother’s story regarding her artwork and the artwork itself, the March 18, 1990 Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Art Heist has been solved. 

Frederick Robinson Koch and John Olsen committed the heist. 

This was reported by Suzanne (me) on June 21, 2012 to Mr. Robert Wittman. On March 18, 2013  (23 years after the heist or 9 months after my email stating the names of the 2 men) the FBI announced they now know the names of the 2 men but refused to release their names. Note they state in the article the artwork moved through Philadelphia, Frederick owned a home in PA – click here

What if that connection was to the Largest Art Heist in History.
No way... RIGHT? 

3/18/1990 Isabella Stewart Gardner Art Heist

Stolen:

  • 5 Pen & Pencils by Edgar Degas
  • Manet painting of a man in a hat
  • 3 Rembrandts
  • Govaert Flinck painting
  • Vermeer painting
  • Bird Finial
  • Chinese Beaker

No way art encounters could collide with not ONE but TWO art crimes ALL occurring in less than 24 months of each other...

Another connection I made is from a newspaper article – http://archive.boston.com/news/specials/gardner_heist/heist/
“But in late April 1994, the museum received an overture that Gardner officials regard as the most promising lead ever in the case. An anonymous letter writer said he could facilitate the return of the paintings in exchange for $2.6 million and full immunity from prosecution for the thieves and those who held the paintings. Because the overture involved a request for immunity from prosecution, the museum turned the letter, postmarked in New York, over to the FBI.

The letter writer showed considerable knowledge of the paintings and of the international art world. He said the stolen paintings were being stored in archival conditions, and had not yet been sold. But, he warned, the museum should agree swiftly to the exchange because the paintings were being held in a country where a buyer who did not know they had been stolen could claim legal ownership.”

Art Restoration

International Art Trading

MOCA

The Ed Koch addresses in the documents come up as being in the block owned by the Museum of Contemporary Art in Miami.

Suzanne has been actively making claims of solving the heist since June 21, 2012 and the fire January 24, 2011. To Robert Wittman and Julian Radcliffe.  Discovered Mr. Koch was Frederick R. Koch August of 2010. So nearly 15 years and no cease desist… 

Verified by MonsterInsights